Separate Bibliography For Sections Word Mac

I'm trying to find a style guide or similar on how to structure or organise a bibliography or reference section at the end of a book.. 58 'DIVIDING A BIBLIOGRAPHY INTO SECTIONS' (I have boldfaced the part which best answers my question): A bibliography may occasionally be divided into sections--but only if doing so would make the reader's job significantly easier.. Rarely should books be separated from articles, since a book and an article by the same author are best listed close together.. It may be appropriate to subdivide a bibliography (1) when it includes manuscript sources, archival collections, or other materials that do not fit into a straight alphabetical list; (2) when readers need to see at a glance the distinction between different kinds of works--for example, in a study of one writer, between works by the writer and those about him or her; or (3) when the bibliography is intended primarily as a guide to further reading (as in this manual).. I have found some recommendations which contradict each other On page 3 says You should not divide your bibliography into separate sections for different document types. Click

I'm writing as a historian/scholar and we tend to work with many different types of sources, so not just books and journals but also manuscripts, letters, promemorias.. Where readers need to refer frequently from notes to bibliography, a continuous alphabetical list is far preferable, since in a subdivided bibliography the alphabetizing starts over with each section.. Perhaps this applies most to a dissertation thesis where there are many different types of references. 2

What is considered good practice here? See the two examples below I find the first alternative a lot more tidy and easier to read, while the second is cluttered and just doesn't feel right. HERE

And says: The bibliography should be divided into manuscript, printed primary, and secondary sources.. Now suppose I add more sections for journal articles, anthologies, etc And this bibliography grows quite large, say over 30 pages or so. 34bbb28f04 https://frosty-shaw-653536.netlify.app/auslogics-disk-defrag-pro-full-version.pdf

No source should be listed in more than one section For alphabetizing, see 14 60--62.. Edit: The best guideline I have found so far is the Chicago Manual of Style 16th ed, section 14.. References should contain all of the information required for a reader to find a source. Click